originally need not pay such a huge cost to toss.

Estuarine county in Yunnan Province in

had a "Chinese ASEAN estuary international tourism culture landscape corridor" project, the 2011 February completion of projects by the local known as the "Pearl of the border", a total investment of 270000000 yuan. But in the 3 years after cheap nfl jerseys May 23, 2014, the project was commenced demolition, relocation compensation fee is conservatively estimated to be around $300000000, higher than the construction cost. (in June 19th, "Oriental Morning Post")

some local officer, even lose money earn call, also always enjoy cheapjerseys.us it. Hekou County of Yunnan had decided to start such a cultural corridor project, the government's strength, that is nine cattle also cheap jerseys do not pull back. Despite opposition, despite the approval procedures are defective, the project is still in the "government approved" imperial sword under the guidance of work completed. But people have not yet fully understand the cultural corridor charm, it also faced the fate of being dismantled. And now, in accordance with the relevant departments to the new deployment, cultural corridor will be transformed into "also to the people, also King River to the people" of the city public space and platform, and this had a set of "cultural corridor of commercial, cultural, tourism and sightseeing in one building with the landscape planning," is quite different.

this means that, in a few short years, around a long cultural corridor construction planning, will be totally different before and after the "thinking", the most direct impact, is to carry out the demolition of completed project. Now a conservative estimate of compensation for the demolition of 300000000, even far beyond 270000000 yuan construction cost. Obviously, this is a The loss outweighs the gain. lose money. Previous to create architectural landscape belt and the construction of European style shops, is likely to be reduced to ruins of excavator. Pity? But some of the functions of departments, seems never bothered to calculate the economic accounts.

since the cultural corridor "along the river shops serious impact on the landscape, has become the hot issue" the masses, so at the beginning of planning and design, decision makers why not listen to the views of the people, to the will of the people is reflected in the planning? To do so, at least you can make the planning more scientific, more in line with the actual needs of the people, not for now people to reflect the strong, the whole project is to overthrow.

Planning changes

from creating "business, culture, tourism in one of the architectural landscape belt" to now "also to the people, but also river scenery in people", if carefully draw public opinion, originally need not pay such a huge cost to toss.

cultural corridor between the built a down, cheap nba jerseys endless consumption of human, material and financial resources, loss, and the damage of the government credit inconstant in policy, who is responsible for this? The loss of hundreds of millions of dollars of public funds, the cheap mlb jerseys relevant departments and persons responsible decision making big mistakes? (Qu Zhengzhou)